Unit of Competency Mapping – Information for Teachers/Assessors – Information for Learners

MEM23131 Mapping and Delivery Guide
Evaluate rapid prototyping applications

Version 1.0
Issue Date: May 2024


Qualification -
Unit of Competency MEM23131 - Evaluate rapid prototyping applications
Description
Employability Skills
Learning Outcomes and Application
Duration and Setting X weeks, nominally xx hours, delivered in a classroom/online/blended learning setting.
Prerequisites/co-requisites
Competency Field
Development and validation strategy and guide for assessors and learners Student Learning Resources Handouts
Activities
Slides
PPT
Assessment 1 Assessment 2 Assessment 3 Assessment 4
Elements of Competency Performance Criteria              
Element: Establish scope of rapid prototyping application
  • Identify technology, including software, used in rapid prototyping application
  • Identify purpose and product of rapid prototyping application
  • Confirm stakeholders to be consulted as part of evaluation
  • Confirm that appropriate support, including technical and professional assistance, is available
  • Determine relevant work health and safety (WHS) and regulatory requirements, standards, codes of practice, risk management and organisational procedures
       
Element: Identify principles and techniques required for evaluation of rapid prototyping application
  • Determine principles and techniques required to evaluate and optimise the rapid prototyping applications
  • Select appropriate analysis and development software and software validation techniques
       
Element: Evaluate rapid prototyping application
  • Assess WHS and regulatory compliance requirements and risk management practices of rapid prototyping processes
  • Assess effectiveness of software for product design, process analysis and optimisation
  • Determine suitability of facilities, services, plant and tooling for rapid prototyping processes
  • Assess materials against specifications in design and suitability for rapid prototyping processes
  • Review prototypes for compliance with specifications and process efficiency
  • Review rapid prototyping cost-effectiveness, including break-even and comparative costing relative to alternatives
  • Review labour and skills requirement of rapid prototyping application
  • Investigate sustainability implications of rapid prototyping application
  • Apply systems thinking, continuous improvement, problem-solving and decision- making, and constraint and contingency management
  • Record results of evaluation
  • Provide documentation including drawings, calculations, product and process analysis, and computer-aided design (CAD) files
       

Submission Requirements

List each assessment task's title, type (eg project, observation/demonstration, essay, assignment, checklist) and due date here

Assessment task 1: [title]      Due date:

(add new lines for each of the assessment tasks)


Assessment Tasks

Copy and paste from the following data to produce each assessment task. Write these in plain English and spell out how, when and where the task is to be carried out, under what conditions, and what resources are needed. Include guidelines about how well the candidate has to perform a task for it to be judged satisfactory.
Copy and paste from the following performance criteria to create an observation checklist for each task. When you have finished writing your assessment tool every one of these must have been addressed, preferably several times in a variety of contexts. To ensure this occurs download the assessment matrix for the unit; enter each assessment task as a column header and place check marks against each performance criteria that task addresses.

Observation Checklist

Tasks to be observed according to workplace/college/TAFE policy and procedures, relevant legislation and Codes of Practice Yes No Comments/feedback
Identify technology, including software, used in rapid prototyping application 
Identify purpose and product of rapid prototyping application 
Confirm stakeholders to be consulted as part of evaluation 
Confirm that appropriate support, including technical and professional assistance, is available 
Determine relevant work health and safety (WHS) and regulatory requirements, standards, codes of practice, risk management and organisational procedures 
Determine principles and techniques required to evaluate and optimise the rapid prototyping applications 
Select appropriate analysis and development software and software validation techniques 
Assess WHS and regulatory compliance requirements and risk management practices of rapid prototyping processes 
Assess effectiveness of software for product design, process analysis and optimisation 
Determine suitability of facilities, services, plant and tooling for rapid prototyping processes 
Assess materials against specifications in design and suitability for rapid prototyping processes 
Review prototypes for compliance with specifications and process efficiency 
Review rapid prototyping cost-effectiveness, including break-even and comparative costing relative to alternatives 
Review labour and skills requirement of rapid prototyping application 
Investigate sustainability implications of rapid prototyping application 
Apply systems thinking, continuous improvement, problem-solving and decision- making, and constraint and contingency management 
Record results of evaluation 
Provide documentation including drawings, calculations, product and process analysis, and computer-aided design (CAD) files 

Forms

Assessment Cover Sheet

MEM23131 - Evaluate rapid prototyping applications
Assessment task 1: [title]

Student name:

Student ID:

I declare that the assessment tasks submitted for this unit are my own work.

Student signature:

Result: Competent Not yet competent

Feedback to student

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assessor name:

Signature:

Date:


Assessment Record Sheet

MEM23131 - Evaluate rapid prototyping applications

Student name:

Student ID:

Assessment task 1: [title] Result: Competent Not yet competent

(add lines for each task)

Feedback to student:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Overall assessment result: Competent Not yet competent

Assessor name:

Signature:

Date:

Student signature:

Date: